The Public Housing Dividend Case Study
How SVT compared public housing pathways by what each would mean for residents.
The challenge
Partners needed to know whether to preserve and expand the system or allow it to deteriorate.
The approach
SVT modelled five investment pathways over 2026 to 2050.
Key results
- The strongest pathway generated about $48.3B in cumulative social value.
- Reduced funding produced negative cumulative social value.
- The same pathway housed about 239,500 people.
Source
Source: The Public Housing Dividend, CANCEA, 2026.
Discuss this work in your context
Talk to us about applying this evidence to your portfolio, programme, or policy question.
Contact Social Value Trust